The above concept of representing buyers and / or tenants is in contrast to the role of a Listing Agent, which in theory represents property Sellers and / or Landlords, whereas the agent has the same fiduciary responsibility to its Seller and Landlord clients.
Real estate brokers that specialize in Tenant / Buyer Representation became more common in the mid 1980’s when a growing awareness occurred among buyers of residential and commercial property of the conflicts of interest that exists in real estate brokerage, which is when a broker represents a property owner in its efforts to sell or lease property, while also representing buyers or tenants. Simply put: How can a real estate broker represent the best interests of a property buyer or tenant, while also representing the best interests of the seller or Landlord. The answer is obvious, it can’t.
The concept of Buyer / Tenant Representation was further advanced by a few highly visible class action law suits brought against large brokerage companies for breach of fiduciary responsibilities, while representing both sides of real estate transactions.
Remarkably, the real estate industry’s response to the market’s awareness of the conflict of interest, and the representative legal complaints against brokerage firms, was not to separate its representation groups to prevent such conflicts, but rather, to develop legal documentation that would allow firms to continue with a “business as usual” mentality. The only solution that seems to solve the issue in the best interest of the customer is separation of business units that represent Buyers and Tenants, from those that represent building owners. In the purest form, firms would exclusively represent Buyers / Tenants or firms would represent Sellers and Landlords exclusively, which was the model for establishing my firm, Carmen Commercial Real Estate Services, in 1993.
Other News
The Indianapolis Business Journal reported reported today that vacancy for Indianapois office space located in the suburban market increased by 0.5% during Q3 - 2007 to 18% , whereas, the vacancy in the CBD decreased by 0.2% to 15.5%. The citywide vacancy for Indianapolis office space increased by a net of 0.2% to 17% overall. Full Story


